![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgDbL9wlDH-ihy-epVG_kdqXjxh8lVvyyqFDVoItjAm-VgqdsjjVH97ha0YgKdUxWEoCzX4_sM916FgdfN_9rmqLn-umtuYMRhxVMhFpmM1q3KHOTCst4oHAJCGDrUM4nxMWOqTdSjyT9g/s1600/Brooklyn+Botanic+Garden+(3).jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxZcFpd1IoW8-buiCZi5tokBpyrLxR39LvQB6DgKGmotsLDo0wHDruJ6VPZLuXuTLnhB0zzQgoxhp5xapRiXmjDqvz22awNeDmn-ErP3TIaOQec9HwW5AZCrm_NDK6vDgNaR5jbWe_JEo/s1600/Brooklyn+Botanic+Garden+(2).jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUCJhoM7K3zsrq2D242KxWPDIZVlZfIGBaEsQCiooW9fSMNhS0eMY-CkYfYmvFUYq-Fxw1SuZPXA2vYGL7T3Bvyrz2kdqIMKUGCzfkkxxdahZJbkQNz8q9OB52vGbjNjgjYQ-8v-7_aiw/s1600/Brooklyn+Botanic+Garden+(1).jpg)
I find I have begun to take more photos with this 1920x1080 aspect. My initial reason to do so was selfish -- I have computers which have screens of these relative dimensions, so the photos fit perfectly as background images, with no padding or stretching required. But while it started with that intent, I am also discovering my "eye" changing to "find" that aspect ratio when I look for something to capture.
But I certainly don't limit myself to the "wide screen" view. Some images clearly need to be closer to square. And, then, of course, some images call for a "portrait view." These are not quite as esthetically pleasing in slideshow mode on my computer, but that's not the only use for a photo, and I recognize that.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEii52nJZHnO5ZRWJD7AFKgv0m5lb_0J8K47gZsSXL1Y4SxjwWkplrSqotS6uvpojuYjBQsdK9LFwxYlEBtOPVikSLs6Vrh4vcUDYxRcx6kOQKitnzzbHQtgvqtXxTjuT8vFF0P3DVouUQc/s1600/Brooklyn+Botanic+Garden+(4).jpg)
Anyway, here's a photo which required a more square view.
Sorry, folks, I just don't know the names for these flowers. I suppose I should. If I were professional, I'd have a journal (or a memory) for them. Me, I just look, admire and take the shot.
No comments:
Post a Comment